Democrat Political Analyst Switches Allegiance To Republican's
By TCO Contributor, Maikali Gilagi Dec. 6, 2019
What would make a Political Analyst leave their long chosen Democrat party and give allegiance to the Republican party? Good question.
Michael Clark, the Analyst spoken of here, gave a very good reason, and after a brief phone conversation, he sent the following email message containing these remarks. Mr. Clark, until just days ago was a Democrat and cast his votes to the Democratic party. He is also a Journalist and Contributor to various news outlets, and a well respected Christian Minister. Here are some of his reasons for switching his allegiance to the Republican party and some very interesting truth's of the Democratic party, from the Obama administration to the present day.
• "Today we find ourselves emmersed in the impeachment proceedings of President Donald Trump. It's hard to go online to social media or any news station and not be bombarded with the story. It's a sad day when opposing views lead to lies and half-truths. In order for someone to get to the bottom of all this ignorance, someone, somewhere along the line needs to do some real research, find facts about the story, and then make those facts available to the whole world. So I will start where the wrongdoing begins. This will clear up any questions regarding the Russian election collusion, the Biden's Conflict of Interest and possible corruption, and bring us to the impeachment farce we are forced to put up with today.
During the Obama administration; Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and a host of other people closely tied to the Obama administration, were selling uranium to Russia.
CNN and other news companies would have everyone to believe otherwise, but the FBI informant surely would not risk serious jail time for lying to the Federal Government and the American people.
Which brings me to Douglas Campbell. He was an FBI informant and testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee, the House Intelligence Committee, and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, on the sales of uranium to Russia.
Mr. Campbell testified that Moscow paid millions of dollars to a lobbying firm to help Bill Clinton's charity in order to influence the Hillary Clinton campaign. Hillary Clinton was then Barack Obama's Secretary of State and had plans to run for the Presidency. He, Campbell, said Russian nuclear officials "told me at various times that they expected APCO to apply a portion of the $3 million annual lobbying fee it was receiving from the Russians to provide, IN-KIND, support for the Clinton's Global Initiative. "
Following the paper trail to companies producing uranium in the United States we see the truth in his testimony.
Just 10 days after the election of Donald Trump, the new President vacated the Trump Tower where he chose to have private meetings. The reason he chose to leave the Trump Tower and adjourn elsewhere is because the former President Obama and his band of half-rights were illegally wire-tapping the Trump Tower. Yet, not only the Trump Tower, but anyone they so chose to spy on, breaking Federal laws in the process. They even acquired highly classified information via queries, through private industry entities that certainly had no business having access to highly classified information which almost always includes some type of National Security concern's. Here's a link to the fact, plus more. Please keep in mind that I know the information contained in this link to be factual.
Many began to resign their post's within hours of learning the secret wire-tapping truth had gotten out.
It should be noted here that it is not illegal for a President of the United States to request criminal and/or civil investigations of U.S. citizens, and the political affiliation of the people of such investigations is of no matter, and neither does it matter if those being investigated are a political opponent of the President. I have read the transcript of the phone conversation and I have concluded that there is nothing said in it that can be deemed as illegal on Mr. Trump's part. Presidents continually work with foreign governments for the purpose of trade and security among other things.
When Joe Biden went to Ukraine, (at the same time his son took the position with the gas company there), he was highly instrumental in having another person replaced in the Ukrainian government. (Calling the kettle black?)
While we're on that subject; Conflict of Interest in the Law concerning the matter is this: "Conflict of Interest is a situation in which a political entity or an acting political entity, has a competing professional or personal interest. Such competing interests can make it difficult to fulfill his or her duties (impartially). A conflict of interest exists even if no unethical or improper act results."
In this case, both of the words "professional" and "personal" come to the fore and the word "impartially" should certainly be of concern. Hence, Joe Biden being a former Vice President and his son being tied to that absolute as a family member. Is anyone screaming they want to see Hunter Biden's financial records? They certainly should be.
Now let's jump to the impeachment proceedings. As of today, December 6, 2019; the House has not named for the White House who will be giving testimony against President Trump. Whereas the Law is very clear.
Every person that is a U.S. citizen has the lawful right to face their accusers in every level of the Courts, whether they are of the general public or a presiding President of the United States. In a country where trickery and confusion is always in play who are we to trust?"
This concludes the email comment from Mr. Clark. After researching his remarks and commentary, necessary links to provide facts have been placed within this article. Happy reading.